Recognition and Aggression of conspecific and heterospecific worker in Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Forel) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v62i1.28-33Keywords:
behavior, competition, defense, etogram, heterospecifics, leaf-cutting antAbstract
Aggressive behavior is important for social insects because it makes possible for the colony to defend itself and the offspring from the action of invasive species. We studied the recognition and aggressiveness of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Forel) to co-specific workers from other nest and heterospecific workers of Acromyrmex subterraneus molestans Santschi, Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus (Forel) and Acromyrmex niger (Smith); and queens of their social parasite Acromyrmex ameliae De Souza, Soares and Della Lucia. Workers of other species were placed in contact with those of A. subterraneus subterraneus for three minutes and during this period the behavioral interactions were quantified. The aggressiveness index (AI) for each agonistic encounter was obtained. Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus workers exhibited greater aggressiveness against heterospecific than against conspecific competitors. Aggressiveness is connected to differences in the chemical profiles, which are larger in heterospecifics colonies.
Downloads
References
Allon, O., Pascual-Garrido, A. & Sommer, V. (2012). Army ant defensive behaviour and chimpanzee predation success: field experiments in Nigéria. J. Zool., 288, 237-244.
Bauer, S., Witte, V., Böhm, M. & Foitzik, S. (2009). Fight or flight? A geographic mosaic in host reaction and potency of a chemical weapon in the social parasite Harpagoxenus sublaevis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 64, 45-56.
Boulogne, I., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Germosén-Robineau, L., Desfontaines, L. & Loranger-Merciris, G. (2012). Acromyrmex octospinosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Management: Effects of TRAMILs Fungicidal Plant Extracts. J. Econ. Entomol., 105, 1224-1233.
Brandão, C.R.F., Mayhé-Nunes, A.J. & Sanhudo, C.E.D. (2011). Taxonomia e filogenia das formigas-cortadeiras. In T.M.C. Della Lucia (Ed.), Formigas-cortadeiras: da bioecologia ao manejo (pp. 27-48). UFV, Viçosa.
Camargo, R.S., Forti, L.C., Lopes, J.F.S. & Andrade, A.P.P. (2006). Brood care and male behavior in queenless Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) colonies under laboratory conditions. Sociobiology, 48, 717-726.
Crozier, R.H. & Dix, M.W. (1979). Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 4, 217-224.
Dimarco, R.D., Farji-Brener, A.G. & Premoli, A.C. (2010). Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav. Ecol., 21, 304-310.
Forti, L.C., Andrade, M.L., Andrade, A.P.P., Lopes, J.F.S. & Ramos, V.M. (2006). Bionomics and identification of Acromyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) through an illustrated key. Sociobiology, 48, 135-153.
Hamilton, W.D. (1972). Altruism and related phenomena mainly in the social insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 3, 193-232.
Hart, A.G., Anderson, C. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. (2002). Task partitioning in leafcutting ants. Acta Ethol., 5, 1-11.
Heinze, J., Foitzik, S., Hippert, A. & Hölldobler, B. (1996). Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology, 102, 510-522.
Hölldobler, B. & Michener, C.D. (1980). Mechanisms of identification and discrimination in social hymenoptera. In H. Markl (Ed.), Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests (pp. 35-38). Weinheim, Chemie Gmbh.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p.
Krasnec, M.O. & Breed, M.D. (2013). Colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbon profile in Formica argentea ants. J. Chem. Ecol., 39, 59-66.
Lenoir, A., Fresneau, D., Errard, C. & Hefetz, A. (1999). The individuality and the colonial identity in ants: the emergence of the social representation concept. In O. Detrain, J.L Deneubourg & J. Pasteels (Eds.), Information processing in social insects (pp. 219-237). Basel, Switzerland, Birkhauser.
Lenoir, A., D’ettorre, P., Errard, C. & Hefetz, A. (2001a). Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 46, 573-599.
Lenoir, A., Cuisset, D. & Hefetz, A. (2001b). Effects of social isolation on hydrocarbon pattern and nestmate recognition in the ant Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc., 48, 101-109.
Lhomme, P., Ayasse, M., Valterova, I., Lecocq, T. & Rasmont, P. (2012).
Born in an alien nest: how do social parasite male offspring escape from host aggression? PLoS ONE, 7, e43053. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043053
Marsaro Júnior, A.L., Molina-Rugama, A.J., Lima, C.A. & Della Lucia, T.M.C. (2007). Cutting preference of Eucalyptus spp. by the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex laticeps nigrosetosus Forel, 1908 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) under laboratory conditions. Ciênc. Florest., 17, 171-174.
Martin, S.J., Carruthers, J.M., Williams, P.H. & Drijfhout, F.P. (2010). Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) reveal evolution of chemical recognition system in bumblebees. J. Chem. Ecol., 36, 855-863.
Martin, J.M., Roux, O., Groc, S. & Dejean, A. (2011). A type of unicoloniality within the native range of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima. C. R. Biol., 334, 307-310.
Moreira, D.D.O., Erthal, M., Carrera, M.P., Silva, C.P. & Samuels, R.I. (2006). Oral trophallaxis in adult leaf-cutting ants Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc., 53, 345-348.
Mori, A., Grasso, D.A. & Le Moli, F. (2000). Raiding and foraging behaviour of the blood-red ant, Formica sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J. Insect Behav., 13, 421-438.
Nickele, M.A., Reis, W., Oliveira, E.B., Iede, E.T., Caldato, N. & Strapasson, P. (2012). Leaf-cutting ant attack in initial pine plantations and growth of defoliated plants. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras., 47, 892-899.
Pamminger, T., Scharf, I., Pennings, P.S. & Foitzik, S. (2011). Increased host aggression as an induced defense against slavemaking ants. Behav. Ecol., 22, 255-260.
Pollock, G.B. & Rissing, S.W. (1989). Intraspecific brood raiding, territoriality, and slavery in ants. Am. Nat., 133, 61-70.
Roulston, T.H., Buczkowski, G. & Silverman, J. (2003). Nestmate
discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insect. Soc., 50, 151-159.
Richard, F.J., Hefetz, A., Christides, J.-P. & Errard, C. (2004). Food influence on colonial recognition and chemical signature between nestmates in the fungus-growing ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus. Chemoecology, 14, 9-16.
Sakagami, S.F. (1993). Ethology of the robber bee Lestrimelitta limao (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology, 21, 237-277.
Scharf, I., Pamminger, T. & Foitzik, S. (2011). Differential response of ant colonies to intruders: attack strategies correlate with potential threat. Ethology, 117, 731-739.
Sossai, M.F., Zanuncio, J.C., Leite, H.G., Zanetti, R. & Serrão, J.E. (2005). Transects to estimate the number of leaf-cutting ant nests (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Eucalyptus urophylla plantations. Sociobiology, 46, 667-676.
Souza, D.J., Della Lucia, T.M.C. & Barbosa, L.C.A. (2006). Discrimination between workers of Acromyrmex subterraneus molestans from monogynous and polygynous colonies. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 49, 277-285.
Souza, D.J., Soares, I.M.F & Della Lucia, T.M.C. (2007). Acromyrmex ameliae sp.n. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new social parasite of leaf-cutting ants Brazil. Insect Sci., 14, 251-257.
Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N.D., Holway, D.A. & Case, T.J. (1999). Behavioral and genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant. Biol. Invasions, 1, 1-11.
Vanzweden, J.S., Brask, J.B., Christensen, J.H., Boomsma, J.J., Linksvayer, T. & D’ettorre, P. (2010). Blending of heritable recognition cues among ant nestmates creates distinct colony gestalt odours but prevents within-colony nepotism. J. Evol. Biol., 23, 1498-1508.
Velásquez, N., Gómez, M., González, J. & Vásquez, R.A. (2006). Nest-mate recognition and the effect of distance from the nest on the aggressive behaviour of Camponotus chilensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behaviour, 143, 811-824.
Viana, A.M.M., Frézard, A., Malosse, C., Della Lucia, T.M.C., Errard, C. & Lenoir, A. (2001). Colonial recognition of fungus in the fungus-growing ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology, 11, 29-36.
Zanetti, R., Zanuncio, J.C., Vilela, E.F., Leite, H.G., Jaffé, K. & Oliveira, A.C. (2003). Level of economic damage for leaf-cutting ants in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. Sociobiology, 42, 433-442.
Zanuncio, J.C., Lopes, E.T., Leite, H.G., Zanetti, R., Sediyama, C.S. & Fialho, M.C.Q. (2004). Sampling methodologies for monitoring the number and area of colonies of leaf cutting ants in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. Sociobiology, 44, 337-344.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).