Effects of Vegetation Structure on Ant Diversity in Different Seasonal Periods in Impacted Fragments of Atlantic Forest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v70i2.7949Keywords:
Diversity partitioning, CCA, Seasonality, environmental variables, secondaryAbstract
The destruction of forest habitats generates extremely fragmented areas and changes in vegetation structure. That changes the characteristics of microhabitats and the availability of resources and affects the diversity of animal species such as ants, which are a large group with an important ecological role. As ants forage on trees and shrubs, the vegetation structure can affect the presence of these organisms. Abiotic factors such as seasonality can also influence the diversity of the ant community. Based on that, this study aimed to investigate the distribution of the diversity of ant species that forage on plants in different seasonal periods. The study was carried out in eight secondary forest fragments of the Atlantic Forest. We used additive partitioning of diversity, partitioning of β diversity and canonical correspondence analysis to measure the effect of seasonality and vegetation structure on the distribution of ant species diversity. The rainy season positively influences the diversity of ants that forage on plants. Composition was affected by shrub leaf density in the rainy season and by tree circumference in the dry. Each fragment preserved a different pool of ant species, and the vegetation structure positively influenced ant diversity. These results highlight the importance of conserving the majority of forest fragments to better preserve the pool of ant species regionally.
Downloads
References
AGEVAP. (2018). Plano municipal de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos. Vassouras, Rio de Janeiro: Associação Pró-Gestão das Águas da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Paraíba do Sul – AGEVAP e Keyassociados, 92 p
Ahuatzin, D. A., Corro, E. J., Jaimes, A. A., Valenzuela González, J. E., Feitosa, R. M., Ribeiro, M. C., ... & Dáttilo, W. (2019). Forest cover drives leaf litter ant diversity in primary rainforest remnants within human-modified tropical landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28: 1091-1107. doi: 10.1007/s10531-019-01712-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01712-z
Ahuatzin, D. A., González-Tokman, D., Silva, R. R., González, J. E. V., Escobar, F., Ribeiro, M. C., ... & Dáttilo, W. (2022). Forest cover modulates diversity and morphological traits of ants in highly fragmented tropical forest landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10531-022-02428-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02428-3
Baccaro, F.B., Ketelhut, S.M. & De Morais, J.W. (2010) Resource distribution and soil moisture content can regulate bait control in an ant assemblage in central Amazonian Forest. Austral Ecology, 35: 274-281. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02033.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02033.x
Baccaro, F. B., Ketelhut, S. M. & Morais, J. W. (2011). Efeitos da distância entre iscas nas estimativas de abundância e riqueza de formigas em uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazônia Central. Acta Amazonica, 41: 115-122. doi: 10.1590/s0044-59672011000100013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672011000100013
Baccaro, F.B., Feitosa, R.M., Fernández, F., Fernandes, I.O., Izzo, T.J., de Souza, J.L.P. & Baselga, A. (2010). Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19: 134-143. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
Baselga, A. & Orme, C.D.L. (2012). Betapart: An R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3: 808–812. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x
Blüthgen, N., & Feldhaar, H. (2010). Food and shelter: How resources influence ant ecology. In L. Lach., C.L. Parr & K.L. Abbott (Eds.), Ant Ecology (pp.115-136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544639.003.0007
Blüthgen, N., Gebauer, G. & Fiedler, K. (2003). Disentangling a rainforest food web using stable isotopes: Dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia, 137: 426-435. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1347-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1347-8
Bolton, B. (1994). Identification guide to the ant genera of the word. Massachusetts: Havard University Press, 222p
Calixto, E.S., Novaes, L.R., Santos, D.F.B., Lange, D., Moreira, X. & Del-Claro, K. (2021). Climate seasonality drives ant-plant-herbivore interactions via plant phenology in an extrafloral nectary-bearing plant community. Journal of Ecology, 109: 639-651. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13492
Campos, R.I., Vasconcelos, H.L., Ribeiro, S.P., Neves, F.S. & Soares, J. P. (2006). Relationship between tree size and insect assemblages associated withAnadenanthera macrocarpa. Ecography, 29: 442-450. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04520.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04520.x
Coelho, R.C. de S. (2011). Comunidades de formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) do estrato arbustivo-arbóreo em fragmentos florestais de Mata Atlântica no Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Florestas. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Ambientais e Florestais). Seropédica: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, 59 p
Costa, M.M.S.D. & Schmidt, F.A. (2022). Gamma, alpha, and beta diversity of ant assemblages response to a gradient of forest cover in human-modified landscape in Brazilian Amazon. Biotropica, 54: 515-524. doi: 10.1111/btp.13073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13073
Crist, T.O., Veech, J.A., Gering, J.C. & Summerville, K.S. (2003). Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: A hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. The American Naturalist, 162: 734-743. doi: 10.1086/378901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/378901
Drummond, J.A. (1997). Devastação e preservação ambiental no Rio de Janeiro. Niterói: EDUFF, 306p
Elizalde, L., Arbetman, M., Arnan, X., Eggleton, P., Leal, I.R., Lescano, M.N., Saez, A., Werenkraut, V. & Pirk, G. (2020). The ecosystem services provided by social insects: Traits, management tools and knowledge gaps. Biological Reviews, 95: 1418-1441. doi: 10.1111/brv.12616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12616
Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 487-515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Francelino, M.R., Rezende, E.M.C. & Silva, L.D.B. (2012). Proposta de metodologia para zoneamento ambiental de plantio de eucalipto. Cerne, 18: 275-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602012000200012
Fowler, H.G., Forti, L.C., Brandão, C.R.F., Delabie, J.H.C. & Vasconcelos, H.D. (1991). Ecologia Nutricional de formigas. In A.R. Panizzi & J.R.P. Parra (Eds.), Ecologia Nutricional de Insetos e suas Implicações no Manejo de Pragas (pp. 131-223). São Paulo: Editora Manole e CNPq.
Freitas, A.V.L., Francini, R.B. & Brown, JR.K.S. (2003). Insetos como indicadores ambientais. In JR.L. Cullen., C. Valladares-Pádua & R. Rudran (Eds.), Métodos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre (pp. 125-151). Curitiba, Brasil: Editora UFPR.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
IPBES (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E.S., Ngo, H.T., Guèze, M., Agard, J., Arneth, A.P., ... & Zayas, C.N. (Eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages.
Klimes, P., Fibich, P., Idigel, C. & Rimandai, M. (2015). Disentangling the Diversity of Arboreal Ant Communities in Tropical Forest Trees. PLOS ONE, 10: e0117853. doi: 10.13 71/journal.pone.0117853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117853
Köppen, W. (1948). Climatología: Con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. (Es) Traducido del alemán. México, D.F: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 474 p
Lange, D., Calixto, E. S., Rosa, B. B., Sales, T. A. & Del-Claro, K. (2019). Natural history and ecology of foraging of the Camponotus crassus Mayr, 1862 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Natural History, 53: 1737-1749. doi:10.1080/00222933.2019.1660430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1660430
Leal, I. R., Filgueiras, B.K.C., Gomes, J.P., Iannuzzi, L. & Andersen, A.N. (2012). Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21: 1687-1701. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0271-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0271-9
Lorenzoni-Paschoa, L. de S., Abreu, K.M.P. de, Silva, G. F. da, Dias, H.M., Machado, L.A. & Silva, R. de D. (2019). Estágio sucessional de uma floresta estacional semidecidual secundária com distintos históricos de uso do solo no sul do Espírito Santo. Rodriguésia, 70. doi: 10.1590/2175-7860 201970028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201970028
Lucky, A., Trautwein, M.D., Guénard, B.S., Weiser, M.D. & Dunn, R.R. (2013). Tracing the rise of ants - Out of the ground. PLoS ONE, 8: e84012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0084012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084012
Majer, J.D. (1990). The Abundance and Diversity of Arboreal Ants in Northern Australia. Biotropica, 22: 191. doi: 10.2307/2388412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388412
Mantovani, W. & Martins, F.R. (1990) O método de pontos. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 4: 95-122. doi: 10.1590/s0102-33061990000300011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33061990000300011
Marques, T., Espírito-Santo, M., Neves, F. & Schoereder, J. (2017). Ant Assemblage Structure in a Secondary Tropical Dry Forest: The Role of Ecological Succession and Seasonality. Sociobiology, 64: 261. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1276
Martinez, J.-J.I. (2015). Monopolization of resources by ground-nesting ants foraging on trees in Mediterranean forests. Acta Oecologica, 65-66: 11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2015.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.03.002
Morellato, L.P.C., Camargo, M.G.G. & Gressler, E. (2013). South and Central America: phenology overview and perspectives. Pages 91-113 In: Schwartz, M.D. (Ed.), Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6925-0_6
Moro, M.F. & Martins, F.R. (2011). Métodos de levantamento do componente arbóreo-arbustivo. In J.M. Felfili., P.V. Eisenlohr., M.M.R.F. Melo., L.A. Andrade. & J.A.A. Meira-Neto (Org.), Fitossociologia no Brasil: Métodos e estudos de casos. volume 1. (pp. 174-212). Viçosa, MG: Editora UFV.
Myers, N. (1988). Threatened biotas: “Hot spots” in tropical forests. The Environmentalist, 8: 187-208. doi: 10.1007/bf02 240252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240252
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858. doi: 10.1038/35002501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Novaes, L.R., Calixto, E.S., de Oliveira, M.L., Alves-de-Lima, L., de Almeida, O. & Torezan-Silingardi, H.M. (2020). Environmental variables drive phenological events of anemocoric plants and enhance diaspore dispersal potential: a new wind-based approach. Science of The Total Environment, 730: 139039. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139039
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Szoecs, E. & Wagner, H. (2018). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version, 2.
Oliveira-Filho, A. T., & Márcio de Mello, J. (1997). Effects of past disturbance and edges on tree community structure and dynamics within a fragment of tropical semideciduous forest in south-eastern Brazil over a five-year period (1987-1992). Plant Ecology Formerly `Vegetatio’, 131: 45-66. doi: 10.1023/a:1009744207641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009744207641
Oliveira, M.A.de., Gomes, C.F.F., Pires, E.M., Marinho, C.G.S. & Della Lucia, T.M.C. (2014). Bioindicadores ambientais: Insetos como um instrumento desta avaliação. Revista Ceres, 61: 800-807. doi: 10.1590/0034-737x201461000005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201461000005
Palacio, E.E. & Fernández, F. (2003). Claves para las subfamilias y géneros. In F. Fernández, Introducción a las hormigas de la region neotropical (pp. 233-260). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboltm.
Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L. & Mcmahon, T.A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 1633-1644. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
Pereira, M.P.dos S., Francelino, M.R. & Queiroz, J.M. (2017). A cobertura florestal em paisagens do Médio Vale do Rio Paraíba do Sul. Floresta e Ambiente, 24: e00134115. doi: 10.1590/2179-8087.134115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.134115
Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer. J. (1996). Microclimatic changes and the indirect loss of ant diversity in a tropical agroecosystem. Oecologia, 108: 577-582. doi: 10.1007/BF00333736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333736
R Development Core Team (2021). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-proje.ct.org/
Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M. (2003).
Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x
Ribas, C. R., Sobrinho, T. G., Schoereder, J. H., Sperber, C. F., Lopes-Andrade, C. & Soares, S. M. (2005). How large is large enough for insects? Forest fragmentation effects at three spatial scales. Acta Oecologica, 27: 31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actao. 2004.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2004.08.008
Ribeiro, D.B., Prado, P.I., Brown Jr, K.S. & Freitas, A.V.L. (2008). Additive partitioning of butterfly diversity in a fragmented landscape: Importance of scale and implications for conservation. Diversity and Distributions, 14: 961-968. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00505.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00505.x
Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C., Ponzoni, F.J. & Hirota, M.M. (2009). The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142: 1141-1153. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
Rico-Gray, V., Díaz-Castelazo, C., Ramírez-Hernández, A., Guimarães, Jr., P.R. & Holland, J.N. (2012). Abiotic factors shape temporal variation in the structure of an ant-plant network. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 6: 289-295. doi: 10.10 07/s11829-011-9170-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9170-3
Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. & Margules, C.R. (1991). Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review. Conservation Biology, 5: 18-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.19 91.tb00384.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x
Stein, S.J. (1990). Vassouras: Um município brasileiro do café, 1850-1900. Tradução de Vera Bloch Wrobel. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 364p
Van Schaik, C.P., Terborgh, J.W. & Wright, S.J. (1993). The Phenology of Tropical Forests: Adaptive Significance and Consequences for Primary Consumers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24: 353-377. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002033
Veech, J. A., Summerville, K. S., Crist, T. O. & Gering, J. C. (2002). The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos, 99: 3-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990101.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990101.x
Wilson, Edward O. “Threats to Biodiversity.” Scientific American, vol. 261, no. 3, Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc., 1989, pp. 108-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24987402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-108
Yanoviak, S.P. & Kaspari, M. (2000). Community structure and the habitat templet: Ants in the tropical forest canopy and litter. Oikos, 89: 259-266. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890206.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890206.x
Zhao, Y., Sanders, N. J., Liu, J., Jin, T., Zhou, H., Lu, R., … Si, X. (2021). β diversity among ant communities on fragmented habitat islands: the roles of species trait, phylogeny and abundance. Ecography, 44: 1568-1578. doi: 10.1111/ecog.05723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05723
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Raquel Cetto Sampaio, Bianca Ferreira da Silva Laviski, Renata Cristina de Souza Coelho, Jarbas Marçal de Queiroz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).